Sustainable Materials and Intelligent Monitoring for Capillary Barrier Systems in Reinforced Soil Structures: A PRISMA-Based Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65904/3083-3590.2026.02.05Keywords:
Reinforced soil structures, Capillary barrier system, Monitoring and intelligent structures, Recycled materials, Sustainable materials, GeosyntheticsAbstract
Capillary barrier systems (CBS) improve geotechnical structures by controlling water infiltration under unsaturated conditions. By exploiting hydraulic contrasts between fine and coarse layers, CBS effectively diverts water flow and reduces excess pore-water pressure. When integrated with reinforced soil structures (RSS), CBS enhances stability by maintaining matric suction and mitigating rainfall-induced softening, thereby offering a climate- resilient and resource-efficient alternative to traditional drainage methods. Driven by sustainability and circular economy objectives, the adoption of recycled and marginal geomaterials-such as reclaimed asphalt pavement, recycled concrete aggregate, and local soils–has increased. In addition, recent advances in measurement technologies and data analytics enable intelligent monitoring of CBS-RSS systems, representing a significant advancement in geotechnical engineering innovation.
However, the specific contributions and limitations of sustainable materials and data-driven monitoring approaches for CBS-RSS remain unclear, hindering their wider adoption in practice. Therefore, this study employed a PRISMA-compliant systematic review to identify, screen and synthesize 82 studies on CBS in RSS, focusing on two thematic clusters: sustainable and alternative materials, and monitoring technologies and data-driven/intelligent approaches. The study shows that recycled materials such as Reclaimed asphalt pavement, recycled concrete aggregate and steel slag can provide the hydraulic contrast required for CBS layers, but that multi-year field validation, leachate characterization and standardized SWCC testing protocols for recycled geomaterials are largely missing. In addition, the review exhibit that instrumented CBS-RSS systems equipped with tensiometers, moisture sensors, piezometers and, more recently, sensor-embedded geosynthetics and wireless or fiber-optic networks can deliver rich datasets, yet these data are rarely assimilated into digital-twin or physics-informed machine-learning frameworks for real-time performance assessment and design optimization. The review connects CBS technology with sustainability and intelligent monitoring, establishing CBS-RSS as a climate-resilient, resource-efficient, and intelligent alternative to conventional retaining systems, and delineating key research priorities for broader implementation.
References
[1] Li N, Jiang H, Li X. Behaviour of capillary barrier covers subjected to rainfall with different patterns. Water 2020; 12(11): 3133.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113133
[2] Rahardjo H, Zhai Q, Satyanaga A, Leong E, Wang C, Wong J. Numerical analyses for assessment of geobarrier system performance. In: In PanAm Unsaturated Soils 2017. 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481677.007
[3] Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A, Gofar N, Leong E, Kew J, Wang C, et al. Geobarrier System for Protection Against Rainfall-induced Slope Failure. ISSMGE International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories 2019; 5(1): 26-43. https://doi.org/10.4417/IJGCH-05-01-03
[4] McCartney JS, Zornberg JG. Effects of infiltration and evaporation on geosynthetic capillary barrier performance. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2010; 47(11): 1201-13.
https://doi.org/10.1139/T10-024
[5] Abishev R, Satyanaga A, Guney M, Lim A, Kim J. Use of steel slag and recycled concrete in geobarrier system for slope stabilization. Frontiers in Built Environment 2025; 11: 1598714.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1598714
[6] Rahardjo H, Kim Y, Gofar N, EC L, Wang C, JLH W. Field instrumentations and monitoring of GeoBarrier System for steep slope protection. Transp Geotech 2018; 16: 29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.06.006
[7] John CK, Pu JH. Sustainable foundations: Integration of recycled materials and geosyn¬thetics in intelligent design. Journal of Intelligent Geotechnical Engineering and Foundations 2025; 1: 1-24.
https://doi.org/10.65904/3083-3590.2025.01.01
[8] Baghbani A, Choudhury T, Costa S, Reiner J. Application of artificial intelli¬gence in geotechnical engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Earth-Science Reviews 2022; 228: 103991.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103991
[9] Rane N, Choudhary S, Rane J. Leading-edge artificial intelligence (ai) and internet of things (iot) technologies for enhanced geotechnical site characterization. Available at SSRN 4640926 2023.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4640926
[10] Zornberg J, Bouazza A, McCartney J. Geosynthetic capillary barriers: current state of knowledge. Geosynth Int 2010; 17(5): 273-300.
https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2010.17.5.273
[11] Zornberg J, Azevedo M, Pickles C. Evaluation of the Development of Capillary Barriers at the Interface between Fine-Grained Soils and Nonwoven Geotextiles. In: Proceedings of the GeoChicago 2016 Conference, Chicago, IL; vol. 2016-Janua. 2016, p. 159-67.
https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480182.015
[12] Holtz R. 46th Terzaghi Lecture: Geosynthetic reinforced soil: From the experimental to the familiar. J Geotech Geoenviron 2017; 143(9): 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001674
[13] Miyata Y. Geosynthetic mse walls research and practice: past, present, and future (2023 igs bathurst lecture). Geosynthetics International 2025; 32(1): 62-81.
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.24.00054
[14] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj 2021; 372.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
[15] Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P, et al. The mixed methods appraisal tool (mmat) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for information 2018; 34(4): 285-91.
https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
[16] Henry KS. The use of geosynthetic capillary barriers to reduce moisture migration in soils. Geosynthetics International 1995; 2(5): 883-8.
https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2.0040
[17] Stormont J, Henry K, Evans T. Water retention functions of four nonwoven polypropy¬lene geotextiles. Geosynth Int 1997; 4(6): 661-72.
https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.4.0110
[18] Holtz RD, Kovacs WD, Sheahan TC. An introduction to geotechnical engineering; vol. 733. Prentice-hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 1981.
[19] Stormont JC. Incorporating capillary barriers in surface cover systems. In: Landfill Capping in the Semi-Arid West: Problems, Perspectives, and Solutions, Conference Proceedings, ESRF-019, Environmental Science and Research Foundation. 1997, p. 39-51.
[20] Baker RS, Hillel D. Laboratory tests of a theory of fingering during infiltration into layered soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1990; 54(1): 20-30.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400010004x
[21] Stormont JC, Morris CE. Method to Estimate Water Storage Capacity of Capillary Barriers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 1998; 124(4): 297-302.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124
[22] McCartney JS, Kuhn JA, Zornberg JG. Geosynthetic drainage layers in contact with unsaturated soils. In: proceedings of the international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering; vol. 16. aa balkema publishers; 2005, p. 2301.
https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-656-9-2301
[23] Khire MV, Benson CH, Bosscher PJ. Water balance modeling of earthen final covers. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 1997; 123(8): 744-54.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:8(744)
[24] Miyazaki T. Water flow in unsaturated soil in layered slopes. Journal of Hydrology 1988; 102(1-4): 201-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(88)90098-4
[25] Chen Y, Gao Y, Ng CW. A new capillary barrier system for retaining wall backfilled with fine-grained soil. Computers and Geotechnics 2020; 118: 103324.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103324
[26] Li X, Li X, Wu Y, Gao L. A novel unsaturated drainage layer in capillary barrier cover for slope protection. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2023; 82(4): 108.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03093-8
[27] Thuo J, Yang K, Huang C. Infiltration into unsaturated reinforced slopes with nonwoven geotextile drains sandwiched in sand layers. Geosynthetics International 2015; 22(6): 457-74.
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00026
[28] Chinkulkijniwat A, Horpibulsuk S, Bui Van D, Udomchai A, Goodary R, Arulrajah A. Influential factors affecting drainage design considerations for mechanical stabilised earth walls using geocomposites. Geosynth Int 2017; 24(3): 224-41.
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.16.00027
[29] Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A, Leong EC, Wang JY. Unsaturated properties of recycled concrete aggregate and reclaimed asphalt pavement. Engineering Geology 2013; 161: 44-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.04.008
[30] Lin C, Zhang X, Galinmoghadam J, Guo Y. Working mechanism of a new wicking geotextile in roadway applications: A numerical study. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2022; 50(2): 323-36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.11.009
[31] Mitchell J, Zornberg J. Reinforced soil structures with poorly draining backfills part ii: case histories and applications. Geosynthetics International 1995; 2(1): 265-307.
https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2.0011
[32] Berg RR, Christopher BR, Samtani NC. Design of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes-volume ii. 2009.
[33] Samtani N, Nowatzki E. Mechanically stabilized earth (mse) wall fills a framework for use of local available sustainable resources (lasr). 2021.
[34] Rahardjo H, Santoso VA, Leong EC, Ng YS, Tam C, Satyanaga A. Use of recycled crushed concrete and secudrain in capillary barriers for slope stabilization. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2013; 50(6): 662-73.
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0035
[35] Portelinha F, Zornberg J. Effect of infiltration on the performance of an unsaturated geotextile-reinforced soil wall. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2017; 45(3): 211-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.02.002
[36] Jayanandan M, Viswanadham B. Geogrid reinforced soil walls with marginal backfills subjected to rainfall: numerical study. Indian Geotechnical Journal 2020; 50(2): 238-51.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-019-00396-0
[37] Vibha S, Divya P. Performance of geosynthetic reinforced steep soil slopes at the onset of rainfall infiltration. In: Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2019: IGC-2019 Volume V. Springer; 2021, p. 167-76.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6466-0_15
[38] Lal BRR, Padade A, Mandal J. Numerical simulation of eps geofoam as compressible inclusions in fly ash backfill retaining walls. In: Ground improvement and geosynthetics. Publication: Ground Improvement and Geosynthetics; 2014, p. 526-35.
https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413401.052
[39] Parmar K, Ranjan R, Patel JB, Tandel Y, Vashi J. Numerical investigation of rainfall-induced instability of reinforced soil walls with select and marginal backfills. Trans¬portation Infrastructure Geotechnology 2025; 12(5): 151.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-025-00608-6
[40] Mills-Beale J, You Z. The mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures with recycled concrete aggregates. Construction and Building Materials 2010; 24(3): 230-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.046
[41] Mariyappan R, Palammal JS, Balu S. Sustainable use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (rap) in pavement applications-a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2023; 30(16): 45587-606.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25847-3
[42] Harnas F, Rahardjo H, Leong E, Wang J. Experimental study on dual capillary barrier using recycled asphalt pavement materials. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2014; 51(10): 1165-77.
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0432
[43] Bhardwaj S, Aggrawal S, Gupta V, Pandey M. Use of recycled concrete aggregate in costruction. Int J Emerg Technol Eng Res IJETER 2016; 4(10): 81-7.
[44] Tam VW, Soomro M, Evangelista ACJ, Haddad A. Deformation and permeability of recycled aggregate concrete-a comprehensive review. Journal of Building Engineering 2021; 44: 103393.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103393
[45] Rahardjo H, Harnas F, Satyanaga A, Leong E, Wang C, Wong J. Numerical simulation of Geobarrier System under rainfall infiltration. Landslides and Engineered Slopes Experience, Theory and Practice 2019; 5(1): 1699-706.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315375007-200
[46] Vieira CS, Pereira PM. Use of recycled construction and demolition materials in geotech¬nical applications: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2015; 103: 192-204.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.023
[47] Park T. Application of construction and building debris as base and subbase materials in rigid pavement. Journal of Transportation Engineering 2003; 129(5): 558-63.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:5(558)
[48] Arulrajah A, Piratheepan J, Disfani MM, Bo MW. Geotechnical and geoenvironmen¬tal properties of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 2013; 25(8): 1077-88.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000652
[49] Poon CS, Chan D. Feasible use of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed clay brick as unbound road sub-base. Construction and building materials 2006; 20(8): 578-85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.045
[50] Koerner RM. Designing with geosynthetics-Vol. 1; vol. 1. Xlibris Corporation; 2012.
[51] Jarjour J, Meguid M, Bhat S. Drainage performance of wicking geotextiles under rainfall and capillary rise conditions. Geosynthetics International 2026; 33(1): 109-24.
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.25.00030
[52] Azevedo M, Zornberg J. Capillary barrier dissipation by new wicking geotextile. In: Panamerican conference on unsaturated soils. 2013, p. 20-2.
https://doi.org/10.1201/b14393-88
[53] Pickles C, Zornberg J. Hydraulic classification of unsaturated nonwoven geotextiles for use in capillary barriers. In: Proceedings of GeoAmericas 2012, the second Pan-American Geosynthetics Conference. 2012, p. 1-4.
[54] Krisdani H, Rahardjo H, Leong E. Experimental study of 1-d capillary barrier model using geosynthetic material as the coarse-grained layer. In: Unsaturated Soils 2006. 2006, p. 1683-94.
https://doi.org/10.1061/40802(189)141
[55] Henry KS, Holtz RD. Geocomposite capillary barriers to reduce frost heave in soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2001; 38(4): 678-94.
https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-010
[56] Lee H, Calvin K, Dasgupta D, Krinner G, Mukherji A, Thorne P, et al. Ipcc, 2023: Cli¬mate change 2023: Synthesis report, summary for policymakers. contribution of working groups i, ii and iii to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on cli¬mate change [core writing team, h. lee and j. romero (eds.)]. ipcc, geneva, switzerland. Tech. Rep.; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); 2023.
[57] Tami D, Rahardjo H, Leong EC, Fredlund DG. Design and laboratory verifica¬tion of a physical model of sloping capillary barrier. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2004; 41(5): 814-30.
https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-036
[58] Garcia E. Function of permeable geosynthetics on artificial unsaturated embankments subjected to rainfall infiltration. Master's thesis; 2005.
[59] Hamdany AH, Shen Y, Satyanaga A, Rahardjo H, Lee TTD, Nong X. Field instrumen¬tation for real-time measurement of soil-water characteristic curve. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 2022; 10(4): 586-96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2022.01.007
[60] Yang KH, Wu HM, Tseng TL, Yoo C. Model tests of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with marginal backfill subjected to rainfall. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2023; 51(2): 342-59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.12.002
[61] You Z, Xu J, Liu H, Peng Y, Zhang Z. Laboratory evaluation of water absorption and drainage performance of a new wicking geotextile in loess-sand mixtures. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2025; 53(6): 1558-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.08.003
[62] Balakrishnan S, Viswanadham B. Performance evaluation of geogrid reinforced soil walls with marginal backfills through centrifuge model tests. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2016; 44(1): 95-108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.002
[63] Guilhot D, Hoyo TMd, Bartoli A, Ramakrishnan P, Leemans G, Houtepen M, et al. Internet-of-things-based geotechnical monitoring boosted by satellite insar data. Remote Sensing 2021; 13(14): 2757.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13142757
[64] Mohammed SA, Zornberg JG. Assessing the influence zone and drainage efficiency of geotextiles with enhanced lateral drainage abilities in unsaturated soil systems. Geo¬sciences 2026; 16(1): 22.
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16010022
[65] Li Gy, Zhan Lt, Chen Ym, Feng S, Zhang Zh, Du Xl. Effects of flow rate and pore size variability on capillary barrier effects: A microfluidic investigation. Canadian Geotech¬nical Journal 2022; 60(6): 902-16.
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2022-0298
[66] da Hora Lôbo BR, Machado SL, Filho EPM. Assessment of cover layers using an instrumented 2d channel with control for climate conditions. International Journal of Civil Engineering 2023; 21(9): 1433-45.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00839-z
[67] Ajdari M, Vahedifard F, Amirlatifi A. Physics-informed data-driven modeling of unsaturated soils under thermo-hydro-mechanical loading conditions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2025; 151(10): 04025108.
